Draft
Conversation
|
Contributor
🟢 No design token changes found |
Contributor
🟢 No unit test coverage changes foundAll components and hooks with tests maintain the same coverage as the main branch. |
Contributor
🟢 No visual differences foundOur visual comparison tests did not find any differences in the UI. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Experiment for BiomeJS vs ESLint (v8) vs ESLint (v9)
Winner is:
Biome66s→2sTotal time takenReasons NOT to use it right now:
List of notable changes:
What should reviewers focus on?
Steps to test:
Supporting resources (related issues, external links, etc):
Contributor checklist:
update snapshotslabel to the PR)Reviewer checklist:
Screenshots: